<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Top High-Yield Online Savings Accounts of 2012</title> <atom:link href="http://ptmoney.com/top-high-yield-savings-accounts/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://ptmoney.com/top-high-yield-savings-accounts/</link> <description>Real Personal Finance for a Life Without Limits!</description> <lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2012 02:15:21 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator> <item><title>By: Nick</title><link>http://ptmoney.com/top-high-yield-savings-accounts/comment-page-1/#comment-34584</link> <dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://ptmoney.com/?p=2865#comment-34584</guid> <description>Given what must be huge profit margin for banks between these savings rates and their lending rates, can anyone tell me why there is not more competition between these savings rates ? Ie why not more competitive upward pressure in these rates ? </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Given what must be huge profit margin for banks between these savings rates and their lending rates, can anyone tell me why there is not more competition between these savings rates ? Ie why not more competitive upward pressure in these rates ?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Nick</title><link>http://ptmoney.com/top-high-yield-savings-accounts/comment-page-1/#comment-34585</link> <dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://ptmoney.com/?p=2865#comment-34585</guid> <description>Given what must be huge profit margin for banks between these savings rates and their lending rates, can anyone tell me why there is not more competition between these savings rates ? Ie why not more competitive upward pressure in these rates ? </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Given what must be huge profit margin for banks between these savings rates and their lending rates, can anyone tell me why there is not more competition between these savings rates ? Ie why not more competitive upward pressure in these rates ?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: joe</title><link>http://ptmoney.com/top-high-yield-savings-accounts/comment-page-1/#comment-29980</link> <dc:creator>joe</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://ptmoney.com/?p=2865#comment-29980</guid> <description>SmartyPig is going down to .70 by December 9 :(</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SmartyPig is going down to .70 by December 9 <img
src='http://ptmoney.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' /></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Philip Taylor</title><link>http://ptmoney.com/top-high-yield-savings-accounts/comment-page-1/#comment-17489</link> <dc:creator>Philip Taylor</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://ptmoney.com/?p=2865#comment-17489</guid> <description>Excellent point, Jared. Compared to 2004 levels, these rates aren&#039;t high. But when you compare them to BOA and Chase checking, they are at least 3 times higher, which is still significant in my book. If you also consider that these banks are virtually fee free compared to those brick and mortar types, the differences really show up. Still, you make a good point about interest rates. It&#039;s hard to get anything for your money these days. I know many people have turned to reward checking, and riskier products like peer lending, and even the stock market to find better returns for their savings.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent point, Jared. Compared to 2004 levels, these rates aren&#8217;t high. But when you compare them to BOA and Chase checking, they are at least 3 times higher, which is still significant in my book. If you also consider that these banks are virtually fee free compared to those brick and mortar types, the differences really show up. Still, you make a good point about interest rates. It&#8217;s hard to get anything for your money these days. I know many people have turned to reward checking, and riskier products like peer lending, and even the stock market to find better returns for their savings.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Jared</title><link>http://ptmoney.com/top-high-yield-savings-accounts/comment-page-1/#comment-17485</link> <dc:creator>Jared</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://ptmoney.com/?p=2865#comment-17485</guid> <description>Can you really still call them high-yield when they are so low?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can you really still call them high-yield when they are so low?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Carol</title><link>http://ptmoney.com/top-high-yield-savings-accounts/comment-page-1/#comment-10106</link> <dc:creator>Carol</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://ptmoney.com/?p=2865#comment-10106</guid> <description>I have checking accounts at 2 small banks that each pay just over 3%. Both the EZ Rewards Checking at Crow River Bank in Delano, MN and the Power Checking at BankWest in Rockford, MN are completely free checking accounts. There is no minimum balance and the 3+% rate is paid on any balance less than $25,000. The only requirements are:  to access online banking and receive electronic statements, have one automatic (electronic) deposit or one ACH automatic debit (ie, automatic payment of a utility bill) and make 10 purchases with the free debit card you receive.  There is no minimum purchase, so you can charge little things like lunch at McDonald&#039;s or any small purchase. The requirements must be met each statement cycle to receive the higher interest rate. If you don&#039;t meet the requirements, you receive a lower rate for that cycle. ATM fees are reimbursed as long as you meet the above requirements for each statement cycle. There is unlimited check writing too.  It&#039;s a great deal.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have checking accounts at 2 small banks that each pay just over 3%. Both the EZ Rewards Checking at Crow River Bank in Delano, MN and the Power Checking at BankWest in Rockford, MN are completely free checking accounts. There is no minimum balance and the 3+% rate is paid on any balance less than $25,000. The only requirements are:  to access online banking and receive electronic statements, have one automatic (electronic) deposit or one ACH automatic debit (ie, automatic payment of a utility bill) and make 10 purchases with the free debit card you receive.  There is no minimum purchase, so you can charge little things like lunch at McDonald&#8217;s or any small purchase. The requirements must be met each statement cycle to receive the higher interest rate. If you don&#8217;t meet the requirements, you receive a lower rate for that cycle. ATM fees are reimbursed as long as you meet the above requirements for each statement cycle. There is unlimited check writing too.  It&#8217;s a great deal.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Mak</title><link>http://ptmoney.com/top-high-yield-savings-accounts/comment-page-1/#comment-9784</link> <dc:creator>Mak</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://ptmoney.com/?p=2865#comment-9784</guid> <description>Emigrant Direct is currently at 1.1% It was 1.4% 6 months ago and has decreased since then.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Emigrant Direct is currently at 1.1% It was 1.4% 6 months ago and has decreased since then.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Rate Watcher</title><link>http://ptmoney.com/top-high-yield-savings-accounts/comment-page-1/#comment-5198</link> <dc:creator>Rate Watcher</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://ptmoney.com/?p=2865#comment-5198</guid> <description>Looks like the best online savings account out there today is SFGI Direct at 2.25%.  Beats my Onbank account which dropped below 1%</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks like the best online savings account out there today is SFGI Direct at 2.25%.  Beats my Onbank account which dropped below 1%</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: PT Money</title><link>http://ptmoney.com/top-high-yield-savings-accounts/comment-page-1/#comment-4283</link> <dc:creator>PT Money</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://ptmoney.com/?p=2865#comment-4283</guid> <description>I agree, thom. We use ING DIRECT pretty exclusively now. I have a BOA account just for making check deposits.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree, thom. We use ING DIRECT pretty exclusively now. I have a BOA account just for making check deposits.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: thom young</title><link>http://ptmoney.com/top-high-yield-savings-accounts/comment-page-1/#comment-4282</link> <dc:creator>thom young</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://ptmoney.com/?p=2865#comment-4282</guid> <description>ING is the best, although their rates have gone down, they provide good services</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ING is the best, although their rates have gone down, they provide good services</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced

Served from: ptmoney.com @ 2012-05-24 10:36:56 -->
